Now that our successful run of Twelfth Night is over, I have some breathing room to put together some of my observations on the recent Independence Day celebrations here in Papua New Guinea. September 16, 1975 marked the day PNG became a separate nation, severing its governmental ties to Australia (but not to the British Commonwealth of which it is still a member). As in many parts of the world, to mark the day there were lots of flags being sold on every street corner and market—not only the black red and gold national flag, but multi-colored flags from all 22 of the PNG provinces (or for those of you who are persnickety: 20 provinces, one autonomous district and the national capital district). Not unlike Fourth of July celebrations in the US, throughout the country there were ceremonies with long-winded speeches from various heads of state and government officials, displays of national dances and songs, a vast array of traditional foods served up (including some delicious sweet potatoes and fried red bananas,) a lot of drunk folks whooping it up over the course of the long weekend, and even a smattering of fireworks. Yet, for all the similarities, I am struck by the vast differences between life in post-colonial PNG and that of more successful former colonies, and am left wondering if independence is always what it is cracked up to be.
The early colonial history of Papua New Guinea reads like
most countries subjected to Western Imperialism, with a couple of important
differences. The first European inroads
to the island were made by the Dutch East Indies Company as they were
establishing their Indonesian presence in the late 1600’s. But claiming something does not always mean
doing anything with it and, unlike other conquests made by the Dutch, there was
no obvious value to the land (its mineral and natural gas resources were not
yet discovered) so it was left more or less alone until sometime in the late
1700’s when the British made a half-hearted play for it. The Brits ultimately agreed to share the
island with the Dutch but also did little with their claim until the Germans
showed up and made a play for the northern part of the island. Wanting to buffer Australia from potential
German influence, the Brits agreed to divide the island yet again, leaving the
east to the Dutch, the Germans in the north and keeping the south-west for
themselves. In the early 1900’s,
administration of the British interest was inherited by the Australians, whose own
history of independence from Britain is even more complicated than that of PNG!
Port Moresby circa 1900 |
There were several aspects of PNG that made colonization
slow in coming, at least until after WWII.
The country that the European explorers found held wild, difficult
terrain populated by isolated tribes of subsistence farmers who spoke over 800
different languages, fought viciously among themselves, and sometimes engaged
in head-hunting, cannibalism and slave trade.
This was not a country with a complex civilization that had developed
written language or sophisticated gold and silver ornamentation like the Aztecs
or Incas. It did not have a readily
accessible or easily captured population which could be pressed into slave
labor like the Mandé or BaKango tribes. Nor did it have the exotic spices like the
Mughal Empire. What it did have was a strategic
location, which was critical during WWII, and a wealth of mineral and natural
gas resources which were not fully exploited until the post-war era.
Early mining operations in PNG |
When independence came to PNG in 1975, it wasn’t generated
by any burning patriotic flame on the part of the Papua New Guineans. There was no rioting demanding the severing
of ties to Australia, no civil unrest, no protests. Unlike many countries that were kicking and
screaming (or at least throwing a good hunger strike or two) for freedom from
their Western captors, PNG was seemingly happy and content to carry on and stay
calm. The country really wasn’t prepared
to set up its own government; in fact, one thing they had to do first was to
identify potential political leaders and send them to school to learn about
parliamentary and political procedures. Yet, by the mid-1960’s and early 1970’s,
prompted by the wave of independence movements in Africa, the idea of continued
colonial presence anywhere in the world became distinctly un-PC, and, with a
little nudging by the United Nations, Australia began to prepare for a
governmental and economic hand-off to PNG.
But, once the keys to the kingdom were passed on to the locals, many of
the expats washed their hands of PNG and over the next few years, approximately
30,000 of them went home.
PNG Parliament in session |
Above the door of Parliament building in Port Moresby |
Even in a country that should be thriving as a result of
income generated by mining and liquefied natural gas (LNG), over a third of the
population is living on less than $1.25 per day, and this is no cheap place to
live. It does not appear that the
problem is a lack of good jobs, so much as there has been little training of
the local population on how to get and/or hold on to those jobs. One of the biggest issues for businesses here
is that the work force is has not had a strong educational system to support
them, nor has there been ingrained the type of work ethic that supports the
economic powerhouses of the world. With
high illiteracy, often weak command of the English language, and lack of
familiarity with western business practices and norms, it is hard to see how
gaining independence has moved the country forward.
Low tide in Port Moresby |
Don’t get me wrong. I
am not advocating a return to Australian or any other country as overlords
here. This is a proud country with a
strong and vibrant culture as well as a population that is fully capable of
running its own affairs. What it does
need, however, is more help in strengthening its institutions, starting with
education both for its children, and for adults who are looking to improve
their job skills. And, to be fair one of
the important players in this arena will continue to be the Australians and,
perhaps the US if we ever really make the Pacific Islands a focus in our “pivot
to Asia” strategy. But it isn’t about
doing it for them…it is teaching them how to do it themselves.
In a way, I am reminded of my own baby steps towards
independence here in PNG. We recently purchased a car here, but I have
been reluctant to drive it for a number of reasons. PNG is a left-hand drive country (steering
wheel is on the right side of the car), which still has me walking to the wrong
side of any vehicle I attempt to enter and not entirely secure in which lane I
should turn into. The car we purchased
is also a manual drive, which means I have to use my left hand to shift gears. Add to that the repeated frightening reports
of violent carjacking across the city, with solo women drivers a popular
target. Besides, I have a number of people who have been seemingly
happy to shuttle me around, so why drive when someone else will do it for me? It is certainly safer and easier for me, but
then, I cannot make my own decisions on what to do or how to get to where I
want to go. At least PNG, as an
independent nation, can make its own decisions on where it wants to go…but like
me, may still need some lessons and support in getting there safely and
effectively.